Isn't there such a thing already, e.g. in the U.K., we have some standardization of salaries for different education levels, specialties and roles. I'll have to look up for the legal documents, but quick search returns payscale.com.
So, while this may be known, do you have more specifics, of what should be the pay distributions? And, btw., how would we deal with the reality, that different circumstances make people value things differently. For example, a surgery may have a huge (life-or-death) value to people, and yet, the social benefits systems working like insurance achieve the reasonable or zero prices on those events.
And, it's a bit like a sub-goal, rather than a method?
还不存在这样的事情，例如在英国，我们对不同教育水平，专业和职位的薪水进行了标准化。我将不得不查找法律文件，但快速搜索会返回[payscale.com]（https://www.payscale.com/research/UK/Country=United_Kingdom/Salary）。
因此，虽然这可能是已知的，但您是否还有更多细节，工资分配应该是什么？顺便说一句，我们将如何面对现实，即不同的环境使人们对事物的评价不同。例如，手术对人们来说可能具有巨大的（生死攸关）价值，但是，像保险一样运作的社会福利制度却在这些事件上实现了合理的价格或零价格。
而且，它有点像一个子目标，而不是一种方法？
Isn't there such a thing already, e.g. in the U.K., we have some standardization of salaries for different education levels, specialties and roles. I'll have to look up for the legal documents, but quick search returns payscale.com.
So, while this may be known, do you have more specifics, of what should be the pay distributions? And, btw., how would we deal with the reality, that different circumstances make people value things differently. For example, a surgery may have a huge (life-or-death) value to people, and yet, the social benefits systems working like insurance achieve the reasonable or zero prices on those events.
And, it's a bit like a sub-goal, rather than a method?
//还不存在这样的事情 信息透明的话，应该是可能的。 我觉得很多不合理的价格是因为供、需的信息不透明而产生的。如果在同一个市场上（同样规则的市场），大家能得到同样的信息，就可以协商出合理的价格。