Trade is care
What looks like simple economic trade, has elements of care and social love.
Look at pretty much any human operations, you'll see many humans wearing or using things produced by other humans: clothes, watches, earphones, tables, computers, pans, beds, etc. etc. You start realizing the significance of this collaboration on the moments of high risk missions -- when people have to depend on mission-critical equipment devised and made by others -- you see a person doing or talking something important, and you realize that those headphones, or that camera, or that network, etc., is enabling the very existence of this or that important mission, and that through trade, while indirectly, all those other people in the economy have come together to advance those positive outcomes that we see. Trade relationships are not so dissimilar from caring and even love relationships, especially, when products in the supply chain are made with care for the others in it.
完全同意。
我的设计英雄之一是 Viktor Papanek。 设计中“同理心”概念的鼻祖(我认为)。
同样在工业设计中,有一部分“需求”现在被解释为市场研究,在我看来,这并不代表准确的需求信息,因为消费主义创造了太多的“需求”,而这些“需求”被广告所吸引。
因此,适当的经典将重新评估。
但是人类现在处于跨战状态,那么我们如何知道我们进化的真相呢? Noosphere Vs。虚拟现实
一个是权力,另一个是瘾。或者...
Totally agree.
One of my hero's in design is Viktor Papanek. The originator (I think) of the concept of "empathy" in design.
Also in industrial design, there is the part "need" which is interpreted as market research nowadays which in my opinion not representative of accurate need information, because consumerism was creating so much "needs" that are umm over pumped by advertisement.
So a proper canon would re-assessed.
But human is in trans-war now, so how do we know the truth of our evolution? Noosphere Vs. the VR
One is power the other is addiction. Or so...
--Bassxn2, 2021-12-26 @23:11Z