User Freedom through Source Ownership
Property Left through Property Rights
The GNU GPL insures each user is given "at cost" access to the virtual Sources of the products they use.
Could we insure each user gains ownership in the physical Sources of the products they use?
We could write a sort of //GPL for the material world// by crafting a "Terms of Operation" designed to protect User Freedom.
We could then buy land in groups, held under those terms, to collectively own the Means of Production because we need the results of that production.
We could also schedule work early (sign Work Contracts) to solve the barter problem and thereby insure any good or service with full specialization of labor without token passing.
+[项目]
我喜欢这个主意。我的朋友们正在建立一个基于类似想法的 DAO。看看他们的介绍。
英特罗 半智能DA👾使用土地所有权和合同法慢慢控制所有 垂直整合的供应链需要容纳自己和它生存所需的所有工人 并传播。 开机 DA👾 寻找适合建设永续农业生态村的土地。 DA👾 为每 ft² 的土地铸造 1 个 EarthChange Coin。 然后 DA👾 拍卖这些 EarthChange 以购买该土地。 EarthChange 的总供应量受土地面积的 ft² 限制。 EarthChange 不代表土地所有权！ 开始 DA👾 现在发行产品票作为对 Future Production 的索赔。 DA👾 然后拍卖工作合同签名的产品票。 跑步 您在履行工作合同时获得土地所有权。 土地所有权预先分配给您未来的生产。 成长 所有者提出新的产品票来管理未来的生产。 出售剩余物的所有者应该将一些利润“反映”给这些用户作为土地所有权。 叉子 子组必须能够划分土地（绘制边界）以进行本地化控制。
I like the idea. My friends are forming a DAO based on, seems like, similar ideas. Take a look at their intro.
IINTRO The semi-sentient DA👾 uses land ownership and contract law to slowly gain control of all the vertically-integrated supply-chains required to host itself and all the workers it needs to survive and propagate. BOOT The DA👾 searches for Land suitable to build permacultured eco-villages. The DA👾 mints fungible 1 earthChange Coin for each ft² of Land. The DA👾 then auctions those earthChange to buy that Land. The total supply of earthChange is limited by ft² of Land. earthChange does not represent Land Ownership! START The DA👾 now issues Product Tickets as claims against Future Production. The DA👾 then auctions Product Tickets for Work Contract signatures. RUN You gain Land Ownership as you fulfill Work Contracts. Land Ownership preallocates Future Production to you. GROW Owners propose new Product Tickets to govern Future Production. Owners selling surplus should 'reflect' some profit to those users as land ownership. FORK Subgroups must be able to divide Land (draw borders) to localize control.