Adversarial companies
Adversarial companies are adversarial companies designed to topple international organisations funded by governments
If competition is good, then it follows that...
Big companies rarely do things efficiently or fairly, they don't compete.
We should make big companies sweat by writing a blank check for companies designed to topple other big companies to do things better than them.
+[项目]
好吧，公司，无论大小，都是政府的 工具，如果在他们那里注册的话。通常，大而繁荣的公司之所以成为这样，是因为对管理的信任，并且代表的不是单个产品，而是被管理的多个产品和团队，因此，它们更像是投资组合而不是公司本身。
现在，假设您想创建一家竞争对手公司。这意味着创建一个竞争的投资组合管理。
那么，我们应该把支票写给谁——另一个竞争的投资组合经理（因为这是他们在财务上竞争的水平），或者你只是指产品方面的竞争？如果是产品方面的竞争，那么为初创公司提供资金已经对建立产生了压力，但这通常不是对建立的金融竞争，因为他们正在收购初创公司，使其成为其管理组合的一部分。
Well, companies, big or small, are tools of governments, if registered with them. Usually, large and prosperous companies become such because of trust in management, and represent not a single product, but a number of products and teams being managed, so, they are more like portfolios rather than companies per se.
Now, suppose you want to create a competitor company. That means creating a competing portfolio management.
So, who should we write the check to -- another competing portfolio manager (as that's the level at which they would be financially competing), or you just mean product-wise competition? If product-wise competition, then funding startups already creates pressure to establishment, but that is not generally a financial competition to the establishment, as they are buying up startups, make them part of their management portfolios.