Online Reading Time and Topic Tracker
A browser plugin that tracks my online behaviour and provides visual graphs on what I'm doing.
A plugin that tracks my eye ball movement, time spent reading an article, parts of text I selected, etc. This data is then presented as a visual graph showing topics I read about, etc.
+[项目]
嗨，[贾斯汀]，您认为还有什么值得追踪的指标来衡量人们在浏览网络时学到了什么？
Hey [Justin], what else do you think it's worth tracking to measure what people learn when they browse the web?
好主意，这当然是可行的。因此，从事计算机视觉研究的统计学家，计算机科学家和数据科学家众多。您需要的是计算机上分辨率更高的相机，或[现有解决方案]（tobii）将眼球用作鼠标。
[ruta], good idea, which certainly is doable. So many statisticians, computer scientists and data scientists working on computer vision. What you need, is a higher resolution cameras on computers, or existing solutions (tobii) to use your eyeballs as mouse.
顺便说一句，在命名上更具体一些，因为此“在线行为跟踪器”非常笼统，可能比眼动跟踪更重要。也许是“在线阅读时间和主题跟踪器”。
[ruta], btw., be more specific in the naming, because this 'Online Behaviour Tracker' is very general, could refer to much more than eye-tracking. Maybe 'Online Reading Time and Topic Tracker'.
[敏迪]
>在命名上要更具体，因为此“在线行为跟踪器”非常笼统，可能不仅仅涉及眼动跟踪。也许是“在线阅读时间和主题跟踪器”。
-那么这是一个项目，而不是一个主意。没有？
[Mindey],
-- this is a project then, not an idea anymore. no?
最初，项目与构想之间的区别在于，项目涉及特定人群，使用特定工具来尝试交付特定的可交付成果。仅仅降低一个想法的普遍性并不能使它成为一个项目。添加具体人员，工具和范围。创意可以是非常具体和详细的，就像专利一样，但它不是没有特定时间和空间，人员，工具和现实世界范围的项目。 :)
[ruta], originally, the difference between a project and an idea is that a project concerns specific group of people, using specific tools, trying to deliver specific deliverable. Just reducing the generality of an idea does not make it into a project. Adding concrete people and tools and scope does. Idea can be very specific and detailed, like a patent, but it is not a project without specific time and space, people, tools, scope in real world. :)
[Mindey]，好的，知道了！有时间轴，人员，工具等的创意便成为计划。谢谢！
[Mindey], okay, got it! An Idea becomes a plan when it has timeline, people, tools, etc. Thanks!
>好主意，这当然是可行的。因此，从事计算机视觉研究的统计学家，计算机科学家和数据科学家众多。您需要的是计算机上的高分辨率相机，或将眼球用作鼠标的现有解决方案（tobii）。
[Mindey]，热图如何获取有关我如何与页面互动的数据？
[Mindey], how about heatmaps, to get the data on how I interact with the page?
热图只是显示点击密度的一种方法，您的问题是首先收集有关眼球的数据点，并推断从该数据中读取的实际单词和主题，例如鼠标指针数据以及其他数据。
[ruta], heatmaps are only a way to display the click density,... Your problem is to collect data points about the eyeballs first, and infer the actual words and topics read from that data, - the mouse pointer data, and other data.
[Mindey]，如果我们考虑人们在网上阅读的方式，我们会发现我们许多人在阅读时会突出显示文本。我的假设是，当我们突出显示文本时，我们会反思正在阅读的内容。我使用各种Web裁剪器来保存内容以供以后使用（即[Evernote]（http://evernote.com“ http://evernote.com”））。我还使用[Rescuetime]（http://Rescuetime.com“ www.Rescuetime.com”）跟踪我的Web浏览行为。也许有更简单的方法可以解决此问题，而不是跟踪眼球？
[Mindey], if we think about how people read online, we'll see that many of us highlight text while reading. My assumption is, when we highlight text, we reflect on what we are reading. I use various web clippers to save content for later (i.e Evernote). I also use Rescuetime to track my web browsing behaviour. Maybe there are simpler ways to solve this problem instead of tracking eye balls?
鲁塔，很好的观察。确实，阅读期间的选择可以用作数据源，并且可以制作一个浏览器插件来收集您访问的所有网站上的信息。可以构建统计模型来过滤该信息，但像提到的（tobii）那样具有眼球跟踪器会更加准确。
[ruta], very good observation. Indeed, selections during the reading could be used as data source, and a browser plugin could be made to collect that information on all websites you visit. Statistical models could be constructed to filter that information, but it would be much more accurate to have eyeball trackers, like the mentioned (tobii).