MRSGREN digital organism interface
A menu system for organisations
A group of human beings want to do something together, so they need some way to relay information and make decisions.
Each person in an organism is a unit that can be commanded and can produce communications to the central point. What if we had a digital system to collect this information, how would it be structured?
I propose MRSGREN as a system for acquiring consensus. MRSGREN the acronym stands for what makes something alive.
Movement, Respiration, Sensing, Growth, Respiration, Excretion, Eating (Nutrition).
Each action in the world is carried out by one of these actions. For example, sensing is how the group of people "see" things around them, for something to be discussed, it must be sensed, so someone as to add the thing being sensed to the system, by creating a new record in the system.
Things in the system can be prioritized, so I imagine a radar system where things closest to the middle are the immediate priority.
Movement is to take action in the world, so to make a decision is a movement. Or a command to command someone to do something. There would be a menu to command others to take a position in the world such as gather data, or acquire resources.
因此，您的假设是所有生物都具有：1.运动2.呼吸3.感觉4.生长5.呼吸6.排泄7.饮食8.（营养）我知道了假设的来源，但是您是否尝试过抽象此外，例如：“呼吸”，“饮食”和“排泄”具有相同的质量，因为“吸入”是“饮食”，“呼气”是“空气排泄”，因此，我们离开了较少的方面。 1.运动2.感知3.成长4.排泄5.饮食6.（营养）如果您认为“增长”作为一个广义的概念，包括自然而然地编码在其余过程中的结果，因此是多余的？ 1.运动2.感觉3.排泄4.饮食5.（营养）如果您认为“营养”在各个层次上都是均衡的，您是否认为“营养”同样可以用“饮食”和“排泄”来概括？ 1.运动2.感觉3.排泄4.吃你是否注意到“运动”和“感觉”都具有非物质性（即，交换力量）？您是否注意到“排泄”和“饮食”都具有物质性（即物质交换）？为什么不用以下术语来概括该界面：1.输入（饮食，感觉）2.输出（排泄，运动）3.力（运动，传感）4.物质（饮食，排泄）？
So, your hypothesis is that all organisms have:
I see where the hypothesis comes from, but had you tried to abstract it further, for example: "respiration", "eating" and "excretion" share the same quality, in that "inhalation" is "eating of air" and "exhalation" is "excretion of air", and thus, we are left with fewer aspects.
Had you thought that "Growth", as a broad concept, includes the results of processes coded in the rest as natural consequence, and thus is redundant?
Had you thought that "Nutrition" similarly is summarized by "Eating" and "Excretion", if they are thought of as balance at various levels?
Had you noticed that "Movement" and "Sensing" both share non-material-ness (i.e., exchange of force)? Had you noticed that "Excretion" and "Eating" both share material-ness (i.e., exchange of matter)?
Why not to summarize that interface in the following terms instead:
?
//输入（饮食，感觉）输出（排泄，运动）力（运动，传感）问题（饮食，排泄）//有用！
// Input (Eating, Sensing) Output (Excretion, Movement) Force (Movement, Sensing) Matter (Eating, Excretion) //
Useful!
将一个新人带入组织就是饮食/营养。处理废物就是排泄物。做某事就是呼吸。
Taking a new person into the organisation is eating/nutrition.
Disposing of waste is excretion.
To make something is respiration.
增长不是多余的，因为您需要做广告或招聘。
Growth is not redundant because you need to advertise or recruit.