Infinity DAO Proposals
What DAO (or DAOs) could we benefit from as a community?
–
DAOs can be useful as vehicles for self-governance of and investment into a community, projects or teams, for representing and managing community and individual assets, and for collective decision-making. There are benefits in project and community tokenization, due to existing markets for tokens, however, becoming dependent on particular markets is not necessarily what community wants. I think, our community should be inclusive, and accessible to people regardless of whether or not they have tokens on a particular blockchain.
Therefore, good choices of DAO smart contracts are needed.
At high level, I think our community should be multi-ledger and benefit from multiple DAO agreements under different ledgers, in the spirit of NNC, and we should think about schemes of tokenization not so much as a method of self-governance, but as a pragmatic tool to move forward through interactions with the markets that have capital for crypto-tokens that we release to represent something we create or want to share with these markets.
What can our community agree on, and what makes sense to do?
I think:
- Since there are many blockchains that support DAOs and smart contracts (HLF, NEM, Waves, Ethereum, NEO, etc.), and there exist many markets that trade DAO digital assets, it would make sense to do some research into what markets could benefit us.
- If we have some interesting ways of tokenization of our collaboration, then we can make and take proposals for specific DAO formation, and try to form DAOs with rules in mind, even experimental DAOs -- just propose some specific smart contracts to go into, and we can consider that.
- The "oo" user associations with each different blockchain. How should it be done, why and if so, what's the best way to do it?
There are all kinds of DAOs (e.g., on Ethereum: (https://app.daohaus.club/explore)), with different self-imposed rules. Explore them before proposing specific way for us to self-tokenize, keeping in mind that rules of a DAO are never correct — the freedoms and modifiability of social contract needs to be considered.
In summary, let this be an open topic for thought of ways of community self-tokenization, and suggest particular proposals of rules of a DAO that could would work for us, as examples of smart contract code, or pseudocode, or just rules describe in human language.
每个人的好作业
Good homework for everyone
0oo可以做成为一个去中心化自治组织形成的平台，它本身也是一个去中心化自治组织。
[+]
[尹与及]，是的，但是作为去中心化组织形成的平台，我们必须开发自己的EVM ，但鉴于有多个现有区块链提供 EVM 的等效项，考虑元 VM 而不是重新发明它更有意义。
让我们想想如何将多个区块链用于一个 DAO，而不是在一个区块链中定义一个 DAO。
[尹与及], yeah, but for being a platform for formation of decentralized organizations, we'd have to develop our own equivalent of EVM, but given that there are multiple existing blockchains that provide equivalents of EVM, it makes more sense to think about meta-VM rather than to reinvent it.
Let's think how multiple blockchains can be used for one DAO, instead of making a DAO defined in one blockchain.
对于 Stop Reset Go 项目，我们将公民社区视为快速、自下而上的系统变化的基本构建块或单元。一个实体社区大到足以拥有规模和容量，但小到足以避免官僚主义并做出响应。由于我们正在开发基于社区/城市规模的快速系统变更策略，其中缩小的行星边界和每个城市的甜甜圈经济指标作为公民旨在实现的目标，因此每个参与的此类社区的 DAO 都是有意义的。
实际上可以有两种交叉类型的 DAO，一种由 GIS 坐标定义，另一种由特定的行星边界/甜甜圈经济工作组/子组定义。一种是社区内的，另一种是社区间的。
大局是创建一个全球公民超级有机体，以实现快速系统变化，基于最准确的指标，细分为城市规模。它通过将大型全球指标转化为在社区范围内有意义的参数来游戏化系统变化。如果足够多的社区达到他们独特的目标，将指标曲线弯曲回安全的运行空间，如果有足够的城市和社区这样做，那么我们可以将整个文明的曲线弯曲回安全的运行空间。实际上，我们正在将大的、模糊的、毫无意义的问题分解成一个对社区公民有意义的小规模、具体、可实现和有意义的问题。
For the Stop Reset Go project, we are envisioning communities of citizens as the fundamental building block or unit of rapid, bottom-up system change. A physical community is large enough to have scale and capacity, but small enough to avoid bureaucracy and be responsive. Since we are developing a rapid system change strategy based on community / city scale where downscaled planetary boundary and doughnut economic indicators for each city serve as targets that citizens aim to achieve, DAO for each such community that is participating makes sense.
There can actually two intersecting types of DAOs, one defined by GIS coordinates and the other by specific planetary boundary/doughnut economic working group/subgroup. One is intra-community and the other is inter-community.
The big picture is to create a global citizen superorganism for rapid system change, based on the most accurate metrics possible, broken down into city-scale. It gamifies system change by turning big global indicators into parameters that are meaningful at community scale. If enough communities reach their unique targets to bend the curve of indicators back to a safe operating space, and if enough cities and communities do this, then we can bend the curve for the entire civilization back to a safe operating space. Effectively, we are chunking the big, vague, meaningless problem into a bite-size, concrete, achievable and meaningful problem that makes sense to citizens of a community.