Why is it that international companies are allowed to avoid competition but individuals are forced to compete globally?
How do we replace competition for individuals with cooperation and maximum mutual gain
+
–
–
The answer is to create organisations that people can be member of that can represent that person.
The world is NOT zero sum. Or at least doesn't have to be.
We can make the world better.
没有子分类。
+[问题]
想法 Adversarial companies
Adversarial companies are adversarial companies designed to topple international organisations funded by governments
+[想法]
+[项目]
[按时间顺序]，是的，这对于远程工作来说是正确的，并且由于通信和运输技术而发生......为此，基于会员的组织可能是一个解决方案，是的。例如，我认为我们可以将 Infinity 打造成一个在经济上支持其成员的组织，仅仅因为他们是成员。把它想象成相反的“税收”，或者有点像“福利制度”。
例如，国家有足够的资源为所有公民提供相当好的健康保险，但为什么要停止健康——食物、交通等呢？身体细胞理所当然地被赋予血液以发挥作用，但人们不知何故会像细菌或病毒一样在竞争中死去或挣扎，我认为这是非常不人道的。这可能是资本主义最不道德的一面，显然，它起作用了——细菌进化出了新的特征。但是，我认为有 另一个 主题。
[chronological], yeah, this is mostly true for remote work, and happening because of communication and transportation technologies... and for that, membership-based organization could be a solution, yes. For example, I'm thinking that we could make the Infinity into an organization that financially supports its members, just because they are members. Think of it like "tax" just in reverse, or a bit like "welfare systems."
For example, countries have enough resources to provide all of the citizens with pretty good health coverage, but why should it stop with health -- what about food, and transportation, and so on. Body cells are given blood for granted, to function, but people are somehow made to die or struggle in competition like bacteria or viruses, which I think is quite inhumane. It's perhaps the most unethical side of capitalism, and obviously, it works -- bacteria get new traits evolved. However, I think there was another topic for that.