Missing institutions
I feel that our society exposes citizens to raw edges of markets. There must be a way to blunt the effects of markets on people. Markets are a good thing but they have unintended effects on people's livelihoods.
+
–
–
This question is to highlight the missing institutions of society. Things that don't exist that should.
没有子分类。
+[问题]
+[想法]
+[项目]
人们可以想到一个机构来关心任意的小事，例如“市场准入”或“补贴”。但是，西方世界似乎选择的最优化方法，是依靠不断发展和筛选获胜者，而不是培育和帮助失败者成长。我认为，它又来自达尔文优化心态，为了创造这种新心态，我们必须将失败者视为离群值-具有非凡潜力的种子-因为它们之所以成为失败者，也许是因为它们处于错误的土壤中，而不是因为它们固有地不合适。有了这种想法，就可以发明出类似“异常局面培育”的机构，该机构专注于挖掘未开发的人才和观点。
One can think of an institution to care about arbitrary little thing, for example, "Market Access" or "Subsidy". However, the very way of optimization that the Western world seem to have chosen, relies on evolving and screening for the winners, not nurturing and helping the losers to grow up. I think, it again comes from the Darwinian Optimization mentality, and to create that new mentality, we've got to think of the losers as the outliers, -- seeds with unusual potential -- because, the reasons why they are losers, perhaps, is because they are in the wrong soil, not because they are inherently unfit. With that thinking, something like an institution for "Nurture of Outliers" focused on mining untapped talent and perspectives may be invented.
对每一个失败的企业进行验尸，人们发现导致他们失败的原因。
我们应该有0个失败的业务计划和0个工作损失（特殊原因除外）。
社会应该是脆弱的。
A post mortem on every failed business ever where people discover what caused them to fail.
We should have 0 failed business plans and 0 job losses (except for exceptional causes).
Society should be antifragile.