Commodification of all things except for queries
Is commodification a good thing?
+
–
–
More services should be commodified. Like a cafe is commodified, it pops up everywhere.
没有子分类。
+[问题]
+[想法]
+[项目]
商品化会降低商品或服务的薪水和最高可收费价格，但会产生使整个行业成为可能的副作用。
麦克唐纳之所以成为可能，是因为他们购买的所有产品都是经过商品化处理的（牛肉，面包产品，鸡肉产品，开胃菜，可乐饮料，饮料）
PC行业已经商品化，可以廉价地购买CPU，RAM，主板和计算机机箱。但是，昂贵的东西是技术工人。在某些时候，计算机系统技术人员的价格将达到平稳状态，软件开发将不再是高薪工作。我们必须尽可能避免这种现实。
Commodification has the impact of reducing salaries and the maximum chargeable price for a good or service but has the side effect of making entire industries possible.
MacDonalds is possible because all the products they purchase are commodified (beef, bread products, chicken products, kechup, cola drinks, drinks)
The PC industry is commodified where CPU, RAM, motherboards and computer cases are all available for cheaply. But the expensive thing is skilled labour. At some point the price of the skilled labour for computer systems will hit a plateau and software development will no longer be a high paying job. We have to avoid this reality as much as possible.
增量结构发现不仅是软件开发的属性，还在于独特硬件的工程设计，独特个性化处理，创造独特艺术品等的属性。商品化是在对某种品质的物品提出需求时发生的，即商品化和包装化的需求量很大。的意义。别忘了，软件也已经商品化了，例如，已经打包了。您需要大规模运行一个简单的功能吗？只需使用无服务器计算解决方案，就可以简化一小部分软件开发（一个功能）。
//在某些时候，计算机系统技术人员的价格将达到平稳状态，软件开发将不再是高薪工作。我们必须尽可能避免这种现实。
哦哦担心AI的软件开发人员？从某种意义上讲，律师也是程序员，而法文是一种编程语言。从某种意义上说，每个人都是程序员。在AI领域，编程称为“计划”。 AI规划的示例是行车路线软件，该软件查找从A点到B点的最佳程序（就像devops工具将系统从状态A转移到状态B一样）。仅仅因为这样的编程是自动化的，并且每个人都使用声明性程序（例如，“我希望构建具有这些属性的系统，并且它是自动构建的。”）而不是强制性编程，所以世界不会崩溃-您将仍然需要人们的好主意，什么样的程序需要自动构建，以及好程序的真正属性是什么。
因此，假设我们现在有一个系统，一个系统，它可以根据临时规范自动开发临时软件，就像Google Maps提供了临时驾驶路线一样，而人们不需要编程不再，但是，只是希望发生一些事情，例如，一个人的个人历史会在个人云中自动编入索引，并根据需要的人的特定心血来动，并可以用于一个人的查询-以及操作系统（我们称之为一个人的“主”计算机）会自动开发并自动部署这样的系统。想像每一个想法，例如：“我希望我为此拥有一个应用程序。” -这样的东西会自动发展。那会不好吗？就像这些天我们认为使用高级编程语言进行编程并不坏一样，未来的人们将只享受“ Thought-to-Software”系统的功能，而他们甚至不必讲话，但是认为他们希望以某种方式发生某些事情，而那会...
最终，我想这是高层的思想和感觉，而不是软件开发，是不希望委托的。
Incremental structure discovery is not only the property of software development, but of engineering of unique hardware, unique individualized treatments, creating unique art, etc. The commodification happens when an item of certain qualities becomes in demand, that's when commodification and packaging makes a lot of sense. Don't forget, software is also commodified already, e.g., it's packaged. You need to run a simple function at scale? Just use a serverless computing solution, and get even a small piece of software development (a function) commodified.
// At some point the price of the skilled labour for computer systems will hit a plateau and software development will no longer be a high paying job. We have to avoid this reality as much as possible.
Oh oh. A software developer in fear of AI? Look, in a sense, lawyers are also programmers, and legalese is a programming language. In a sense, everyone is a programmer. In the AI domain, programming is called "planning". Example of AI planning is driving directions software, that finds the best program to go from point A to point B (just like devops tools take a system from state A to state B). Just because such programming gets automated, and everyone uses declarative programs (e.g., "I want the system of these properties built, and it gets built automatically.") instead of imperative programming, the world doesn't fall apart -- you'll still need good ideas from people, what kind of programs need to get auto-constructed, and what actually are properties of good programs.
So, imagine that we now have a system, that we have a system, that auto-develops ad-hoc software based on ad-hoc specifications, just like Google Maps gives ad-hoc driving routes, and people don't need to program anymore, but instead, just to wish that something happens, e.g., that one's personal history is auto-indexed in personal cloud with specific whims of the person who wants, and becomes available for one's queries -- and the operating system (let's call it "Master" computer in one's home) auto-develops and auto-deploys such system. Imagine of every whim, like, "I wish I had an app for this and that." -- and such things auto-developing. Would that be bad? Just like these days we don't think it's bad to program in higher level programming language, the people of the future will simply enjoy the capability of "Thought-to-Software" systems, where they don't even have to speak, but think that they'd want something happen in some way, and it would....
Ultimately, I guess it's high level thinking and feeling, not software development, is what don't want to delegate.