Thinking Culture

How to move from no-thinking to insight?

YAML 问题

Creativity welcomes everyone who has a need to express themselves. But creativity starts with thinking. And thinking is not part of a modern culture (consumerism is).

Here I wonder, what's the best way to learn thinking for someone who has never done it? And how does tetrahedron example apply for facilitation of thinking for someone?


没有子分类。




投票 (可选) (别通知) (可选)
请,登录

富勒(B.Fuller)将生活定义为“思想”,而4是具有思想的最小值。但是,这实际上意味着什么呢?

参考:

http://www.rwgrayprojects.com/synergetics/s05/p1000.html

B.Fuller defines life as "thoughts" and 4 being a min.number for having a thought. But what does it mean in practise?

Reference: http://www.rwgrayprojects.com/synergetics/s05/p1000.html


“更全面的解释”读书俱乐部的注释:

“思维隔离事件;“理解”然后将它们互连。“理解是结构”。

“意识到一个思想至少需要足够的“东西”来定义一个孤立的系统,因此知道最小数目似乎至关重要。”

“一个“思想”是一个“相关的集合”:经验以某种方式彼此相关。所有其余的经验都在集合之外,而没有调入。”

-听起来像是一种创造力/观念的结构!可以转化为“学习如何思考”指南

Notes from "A Fuller Explanation" book club:

"Thinking isolates events; "understanding" then interconnects them. "Understanding is structure,"

"Realizing that a thought required at least enough "somethings" to define an isolated system, it seemed vitally important to know the minimum number ..."

"A "thought" is a "relevant set": experiences related to each other in some way. All the rest of experience is outside the set-not tuned in."

-- sounds like a structure of creativity/ideation! which could be transformed into "learning how to think" guidance"


//思维不是现代文化的一部分(消费主义是)。

这确实是有见地的。在当前系统下发生的事情是AI直接连接到[limbic系统](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Limbic_system),而不是[neocortex](https://en.wikipedia.org / wiki / Neocortex)。之所以发生这种情况,是因为营销人员发现,潜意识和潜意识的信息传递效果更好,并且滥用了人们的大脑回路(limbic系统),通过与那些更基本的需求相关的货币系统来控制人口,并将整个互联网推向了这一方向。 “图像优先”而不是“表格优先”。

我认为,这可能是由于缺乏大数据去中心化思考的工具,而新的思想可能会改变现状。

// And thinking is not part of a modern culture (consumerism is).

This is insightful, and indeed. What is happening under the current system, is AI getting directly connected to the limbic system, not the neocortex. This seem to have happened due to marketers finding out that subliminal and subconscious messaging works better, and abusing people's brain circuitry (limbic system), to control the populations with monetary system connected to those more basic needs, and pushing the whole internet to that direction of "images-first" instead of "tables first."

It may be because of the lack of tools for big-data decentralized thinking, and new ideas for that may change the status quo, I believe.


我曾经以为我很直觉,所以没有想到。所以我不认为事情会积极进行。我没有内部独白。我只是做。

我对事物非常深刻地思考,但这都是无形的思想,而且是表面之下的。

它是口头的。

I used to think I didn't think, as I was intuitive. So I don't think things through actively. I don't have an internal monologue. I just do.

I think pretty deeply about things, but it's all invisible thoughts and below the surface.

It's pre-verbal.


为了阐明我为什么要分享这个问题,我将进一步问“创造力是如何发生的?”。对我来说,这是关于收集草稿(灵感和观察),然后,当我的思维散焦时,突然之间思想联系起来,洞察力诞生了!

总体而言,对我而言,(创造性)思维就像将思维建构为难题一样,是由别人的思想以及我的经历引发的。

(有关“精神分散和专注”的相关资源,以及两种情况下大脑中发生的事情都是“学习方法”课程-参见链接)

我提到B.Fuller的“有思想的系统”思想是有目的的,因为我想知道在收集观察结果并将其综合为见解的过程中是否存在一些指导数字。

反思思想是如何发生的,尤其是有价值的思想,这是很有用的,因为如果可以改变教育,那么它就可以转变为教人们如何更好地思考。

to clarify why I share this question, I would further ask "how does creativity occur?". to me, it's about collecting drafts (inspirations and observations) and then, suddenly when my mind is defocused, thoughts connect and an insight is born!

overall, to me, (creative) thinking is like constructing thoughts as puzzles which are sparked by someone else's thoughts and also my experiences.

(related resource on "mind defocused and focused" and what happens in the brain in both cases is Learning How to Learn course - see links)

I mention B.Fuller's thinking on "thoughts being a system" on purpose, because I wonder if there's some guiding number in the process of collecting observations and then synthesising them into an insight.

it's useful to reflect on how thoughts occur, and especially valuable thoughts, because if education can be transformed, so it can be transformed into a teaching people how to think better.